Seagate FireCuda 540 Specifications
| 2TB | 1TB | |
| Standard Model | ZP2000GM30004 | ZP1000GM30004 |
| Interface | PCIe Gen5 ×4 NVMe 2.0 | PCIe Gen5 ×4 NVMe 2.0 |
| NAND Flash Memory | 3D TLC | 3D TLC |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280-D2 | M.2 2280-D2 |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (Max, MB/s), 1MB | 10,000 | 9,500 |
| Sequential Write (Max, MB/s), 1MB | 10,000 | 8,500 |
| Random Read (Max, IOPS), 4KB QD32 T8 | 1,490,000 | 1,300,000 |
| Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4KB QD32 T8 | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 |
| Endurance/Reliability | ||
| Total Bytes Written (TB) | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours) | 1,800,000 hrs | 1,800,000 hrs |
| Rescue Data Recovery Services (years) | 3 | 3 |
| Warranty, Limited (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Power Management | ||
| Active Power, Average (W) | 11 | 10 |
| Idle Power PS3, Average (mW) | 144 | 144 |
| Environmental | ||
| Temperature, Operating Internal (°C) | 0°C – 70°C | 0°C – 70°C |
| Temperature, Nonoperating (°C) | -40°C – 85°C | -40°C – 85°C |
| Shock, Nonoperating: 0.5ms (Gs) | 1500Gs | 1500Gs |
| Special Features | ||
| TRIM | Yes | Yes |
| S.M.A.R.T. | Yes | Yes |
| SED TCG Opal 2.01 | Yes | Yes |
| RoHS Compliance | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Length (mm/in, max) | 80.15mm/3.155in | 80.15mm/3.155in |
| Width (mm/in, max) | 22.15mm/0.872in | 22.15mm/0.872in |
| Height (mm/in, max) | 3.58mm/0.140in | 3.58mm/0.140in |
| Weight (g/lb) | 7.4g/0.016lb | 7.4g/0.016lb |
Seagate FireCuda 540 Performance
For this review, we’re testing the 2TB Seagate Firecuda 540. Alongside it as comparables are a mixture of popular Gen4 SSDs, along with the first wave of Gen5 SSDs. Incidentally, all of the Gen5 are the same Phison E26 platform as the Firecuda 540.
For testing, we use two platforms. One is our consumer test platform that supports PCIe Gen4/Gen5 SSDs, which is sometimes leveraged for lighter consumer-based tests such as BlackMagic DiskSpeed Test and CrystalDiskMark. Our main platform, though, which overlaps with our enterprise tests, is a Dell PowerEdge R760. For ultimate flexibility, we worked with Serial Cables, who supplied us with an 8-bay PCIe Gen5 JBOF for U.2/U.3, M.2, and E1.S/E3.S drive testing. This allows us to test all current and emerging drive types on the same test hardware.
Dell PowerEdge R760 Configuration
- Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6430 (32 cores/64 threads, 1.9GHz base)
- 1TB DDR5 RAM
- Ubuntu 22.04
VDBench Workload Analysis
When benchmarking storage devices, application testing is best, and synthetic testing is second. While not a perfect representation of actual workloads, synthetic tests help baseline storage devices with a repeatability factor that makes it easy to compare competing solutions. These workloads offer a range of testing profiles ranging from “four corners” tests, common database transfer size tests, to trace captures from different VDI environments.
These tests leverage the common vdBench workload generator, with a scripting engine to automate and capture results over a large compute testing cluster. This allows us to repeat the same workloads across various storage devices, including flash arrays and individual storage devices. Our testing process for these benchmarks fills the entire drive surface with data, then partitions a drive section equal to 1% of the drive capacity to simulate how the drive might respond to application workloads. This is different from full entropy tests, which use 100% of the drive and take them into a steady state. As a result, these figures will reflect higher-sustained write speeds.
For testing, we use two platforms. One is our consumer test platform that supports PCIe Gen4/Gen5 SSDs, which is sometimes leveraged for lighter consumer-based tests such as BlackMagic DiskSpeed Test and CrystalDiskMark. Our main platform, though, which overlaps with our enterprise tests, is a Dell PowerEdge R760. For ultimate flexibility, we worked with Serial Cables, who supplied us with an 8-bay PCIe Gen5 JBOF for U.2/U.3, M.2, and E1.S/E3.S drive testing. This allows us to test all current and emerging drive types on the same test hardware.
Dell PowerEdge R760 Configuration
- Dual Intel Xeon Gold 6430 (32 cores/64 threads, 1.9GHz base)
- 1TB DDR5 RAM
- Ubuntu 22.04
Profiles:
- 4K Random Read: 100% Read, 128 threads, 0-120% iorate
- 4K Random Write: 100% Write, 64 threads, 0-120% iorate
- 64K Sequential Read: 100% Read, 16 threads, 0-120% iorate
- 64K Sequential Write: 100% Write, 8 threads, 0-120% iorate
- VDI Profiles
Starting with 4K random read, the FireCuda 540 Gen5 SSD showed top results, posting a peak of 989K IOPS at 128.6µs in latency trailing just the Solidigm P44 Pro (Of note, this is a Gen4 drive).
The FireCuda 540 didn’t fare well in 4K random writes, however. Here, it ended the test third to last with just 251K IOPS with a latency of 98.7µs. In comparison, the top-performing Samsung 990 Pro 2TB peaked at 573K IOPS.
As expected, the FireCuda 540 performed better when switching to sequential 64K workloads reads (noticeably better than the Aorus 10000 Gen5 drive). Here, it had a peak throughput of 6.93GB/s read with a latency of 287.8µs.
In sequential writes, the FireCuda 540 fell back among the bottom dwellers of the leaderboard again, peaking at just 1.28GB/s (or 21K IOPS) with a latency of 773.6µs.
Next, we looked at our VDI benchmarks, designed to tax the drives further. These tests include Boot, Initial Login, and Monday Login. The FireCuda 540 fared well here; however, the results were still around top-end Gen4-level speeds. Starting with Boot, the FireCuda 540 peaked at 200K IOPS (at 162.6µs) before taking a small spike in performance at the end.
For VDI Initial Login, the FireCuda 540 ended the test at 59K IOPS (at 503.4µs). Though its predecessor, the FireCuda 530, showed better peak performance, it was much more unstable.
Finally, the VDI Monday Login benchmark, where the FireCuda 540 was by far the best-performing and most stable SSD. Here, we saw a peak of just 46K IOPS with a latency of 342.9µs.
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
We measured performance inside a Windows 11 environment on our consumer test platform via the popular Blackmagic test. Here, the FireCuda 540 recorded an impressive 9.6GB/s write, while reads were slightly more modest at 6.74GB/s.
CrystalDiskMark Speed Test
We performed a lighter-weight test on the Seagate FireCuda 540 to demonstrate its Gen5 speeds. Using CrystalDiskMark, we observed sequential transfer speeds exceeding 10GB/s for both read and write operations. For Random 4K performance, the drive achieved 1.0 million IOPS for reads and 1.01 million IOPS for write operations. CrystalDiskMark’s higher queue depth (compared to BlackMagic) allows us to showcase the best-case scenario for the drive.
Sandy Yang/Global Strategy Director
WhatsApp / WeChat: +86 13426366826
Email: yangyd@qianxingdata.com
Website: www.qianxingdata.com/www.storagesserver.com
Business Focus:
ICT Product Distribution/System Integration & Services/Infrastructure Solutions
With 20+ years of IT distribution experience, we partner with leading global brands to deliver reliable products and professional services.
“Using Technology to Build an Intelligent World”Your Trusted ICT Product Service Provider!



